Hollywood Ending

Hollywood Ending

A farewell to Sherman Torgan, owner of the New Beverly Cinema, L.A.'s last fulltime revival house

By Andy Klein

There are lots of noble endeavors that could be characterized as "Quixotic," but, when I hear the word in a contemporary context, I always think of the New Beverly Cinema, whose owner, Sherman Torgan, died suddenly last week of a heart attack.

Maybe it didn't seem like a crazy idea at first. Sherman started the New Beverly back in 1978 - only in hindsight a miracle of bad timing. VCRs were on the market but were still in the early adopter stage; limited titles were available, and rental outlets barely existed. Cable was beginning to get a foothold, but, outside of the area served by the groundbreaking Z Channel, premium movie channels showed only recent releases. In short, if you wanted to see a subtitled film or an obscure cult favorite or even an uncut, commercial-free old classic, you had to wait until it showed up at a revival house.

The New Beverly was part of a boom in such venues. I arrived in L.A. just a few months after Torgan opened his doors. Back then film buffs also had the Rialto, the Fox Venice, the El Rey, the Vista, the Vagabond, the Loyola, the Sherman, and the Nuart (long before it switched to first-run programming); others came and went, as home video and cable took their toll. By the '90s, the New Beverly was the only one left that had continuously maintained fulltime revival programming.

The convenient access afforded by home video and cable is a wondrous thing, and the many compromises - in terms of size, sound, and visual quality - have become less significant with DVD and huge HDTVs. These systems may never match a projected 35mm print on a theatrical-size screen - or maybe they will - but there are other aspects of actual moviegoing that can't, by definition, be captured at home.

Sherman knew this: It isn't just the thrill of the big screen; there's also the experience of seeing a movie in a crowd of relative strangers. This is even more significant at a rep house, where those strangers have only one overriding bond - they've all been willing to go through the hassle of leaving their cocoons because they want to see this specific movie.

But Sherman couldn't avoid the fact that he was bucking the tides of history and technology, and he sounded increasingly discouraged over the years, some of which may have been the result of sheer physical exhaustion.

I had often wondered how he had managed to keep the theater afloat in such an unfriendly fiscal environment. Grants? Secret trust fund? Sticking up 7/11s?

"No, he runs it on a shoestring, and he doesn't have a lavish lifestyle. Basically he keeps expenses low by doing almost everything himself," says Jeffrey Rosen, who worked with him on and off for 30 years. I'm talking to him two days after Sherman's death, but he reflexively speaks in the present tense. "He does the booking, prints the calendar, picks up the prints ... everything except the projection. His son Michael helps out, but he's got a fulltime job. I consult on the programming.

"Really, Sherman is the theater."

That characterization explains the only brief bad moment I had with Sherman in twentysome years of friendly professional contact. Some time in the '90s, I had written glowingly about the theater in an article about non-standard venues in Los Angeles. At the end, I mentioned its one real negative - the uncomfortable seats.

I thought Sherman would be delighted with the write-up, but, the next time I spoke to him, his appreciation was almost completely ruined by my mention of the seats. His disappointment wasn't, I think, because I might have hurt his business. It was more like telling someone that he has great kids, but, whew!, talk about uggggly ... .

Just when the theater was (not for the first time) in really bad financial straits, last spring's Grindhouse Festival, organized by Quentin Tarantino around the release of Grindhouse, was a great commercial boost; Tarantino's cache immediately guaranteed a level of press support Sherman could never have mustered on his own.

Whether the theater will be able to continue in his absence is still an open question. Family, friends, and colleagues are still too stunned by the suddenness of his death to concentrate on that. It's unimaginable that someone will show up with the same level of dedication and energy. On the other hand, it was unimaginable that Sherman could have kept it going all these years ... but he did.

In the meanwhile, so long, Sherman ... and thanks for all the films.

Published: 07/26/2007

DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT

Other Stories by Andy Klein

Related Articles

Post A Comment

Requires free registration.

(Forgotten your password?")